Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Gerber, Scott Douglas

Titel

Seriatim : the Supreme Court before John Marshall

Ort / Verlag

New York : New York University Press

Erscheinungsjahr

1998

Link zum Volltext

• JSTOR - Open Access E-Books (ZDB-39-JOA)

  Kostenfrei

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Introduction : the Supreme Court before John Marshall / Scott Douglas Gerber -- "Honour, justice, and interest" : John Jay's Republican politics and statesmanship on the federal bench / Sandra Frances Vanburkleo -- John Rutledge : distinction and declension / James Haw -- Deconstructing William Cushing / Scott Douglas Gerber -- James Wilson : democratic theorist and Supreme Court justice / Mark D. Hall -- John Blair : "a safe and conscientious judge" / Wythe Holt -- James Iredell : revolutionist, constitutionalist, jurist / Willis P. Whichard -- William Paterson : small states' nationalist / Daniel A. Degnan, S.J. -- The verdict on Samuel Chase and his "apologist" / Stephen B. Presser -- Oliver Ellsworth : "I have sought the felicity and glory of your administration" / William R. Casto -- Heir apparent : Bushrod Washington and federal justice in the early republic / James R. Stoner, Jr
• "Seldom has American law seen a more towering figure than Chief Justice John Marshall. Indeed, Marshall is almost universally regarded as the 'father of the Supreme Court' and 'the jurist who started it all.' Yet even while acknowledging the indelible stamp Marshall put on the Supreme Court, it is possible--in fact necessary--to examine the pre-Marshall Court, and its justices, to gain a true understanding of the origins of American constitutionalism. The ten essays in this tightly edited volume were especially commissioned for the book, each by the leading authority on his or her particular subject. They examine such influential justices as John Jay, John Rutledge, William Cushing, James Wilson, John Blair, James Iredell, William Paterson, Samuel Chase, Oliver Ellsworth, and Bushrod Washington. The result is a fascinating window onto the origins of the most powerful court in the world, and on American constitutionalism itself."--JSTOR website (viewed March 7, 2017)